MSCC, Sharon Jasprizza, November 5, 2024, Time: 9:30 am-11:00 am, ZOOM.US

SUMMARY

• Ray Rogers, Director of Corporate Campaign to end the Stock Transfer Tax Rebate: Emphasizes the significance of the stock transfer tax, which was in effect from 1905 until 1981, when it was halted, resulting in a substantial loss of potential revenue for the state—estimated between $13 to $20 billion annually if reinstated. This revenue could address critical social needs in New York, including funding for educational institutions and housing
• Renee Keitt: acknowledges the issue of over 1,500 vacant apartments in NYCHA but emphasizes that the problems extend beyond NYCHA to all housing sectors, such as rent-controlled and stabilized units, highlighting a broader systemic problem
• Natasha Florentino: a documentary filmmaker working on a film about the privatization of public housing across the U.S. Currently focusing on a short documentary about a proposed demolition plan in Chelsea as an educational tool for residents and the community to understand the realities of living through a demolition plan, countering the appealing images of new apartments that often entice public support

CHAIR: John Mudd

SECRETARY: Sharon Jasprizza

POLICY MEETING UPDATES

There were no updates for the 8:30 AM Homeless and Housing Policy. 

OCTOBER HIGHLIGHTS

• John Mudd, MSCC:  delivered impactful testimony for the NYC Council’s Zoning Committee on the City of Yes in October 2024. Stay tuned for more updates on the fight to stop developers from taking over our city. Public testimony at https://www.youtube.com/live/9E4Q2P6OyRY 
• A huge THANK YOU from MSCC to all the amazing volunteers who dedicated their summer to the MSCC Urban Farm Program! Your hard work in farming, harvesting, packaging, and distributing fresh food has made a real difference for those in shelters and those without access to nutritious meals. Together, we’re growing hope and community! Our farms shut down in October, and MSCC is preparing for 2025

SPECIAL INTRODUCTION(S) AND OR UPDATES:

• Jessica Guity Thompson, Senior Vice President of Operations for Progressive Management
• Rob Robinson, Partners for Dignity and Rights, an Adjunct Professor of Urbanism at the New School in New York City: details about upcoming events related to homelessness in New York City. He mentioned a monthly meeting that occurs on the first Thursday of each month, involving various stakeholders, including government agencies, advocacy groups, and individuals with lived experiences of homelessness. The next meeting is scheduled for this Thursday, and Robinson will report back on the outcomes. Additionally, he highlighted an important event on November 20th, where a national versus local homeless policy meeting will take place at the CUNY Graduate Center from 9 AM to 1:30 PM. Robinson will be speaking on the second panel, along with other notable participants, and he anticipates a dynamic discussion, expressing his willingness to share differing opinions. This event is free and open to the public, and he encourages attendance for those interested in engaging with the topic.
• Andrew Bonfrancesco, the Program Coordinator for the Positive Health Project at Housing Works: focusing on housing-related programs.
• Harvey Montague, AIA Urban Designer: Architect and Urban Designer specializing in housing
• Damyanti Radheshwar (Damu), Architect and Urban Planner in New York: expressed concerns about the stigma surrounding public housing, particularly NYCHA projects, where residents often face societal disrespect. Damu highlighted the need for a shift in perspective regarding public housing, advocating for better treatment and integration of social housing similar to models in European countries. She emphasized that solutions must come from grassroots efforts rather than relying solely on government or institutional support
• Alex Yong, WSNA NYC, Member of the End Apartment Warehousing Coalition, Westside Neighborhood Alliance: addresses the presence of an alternative initiative called “City for All,” introduced by Adrian Adams. This initiative contrasts with the “City of Yes” program. There is curiosity about whether certain text within this alternative relates to a previously controversial program called “Unlocking Doors.” The Westside Neighborhood Alliance is currently investigating the potential connection between these two initiatives to clarify any associations or implications

STOCK TRANSFER TAX

Ray Rogers,  Co-founder and Director of New York City-based Corporate Campaign Inc. (CCI), to end the Stock Transfer Tax Rebate and has championed labor, human rights, and environmental causes since 1981, stoprebnybullies.org (Real Estate Board of New York REBNY)

• Ray has a background in labor unions and community organizing and is currently collaborating with Ralph Nader and others to push for this legislative change
• Advocates for the repeal of the stock transfer tax rebate in New York. He has a background in labor unions and community organizing and is currently collaborating with Ralph Nader and others to push for this legislative change
• Emphasizes the significance of the stock transfer tax, which was in effect from 1905 until 1981, when it was halted, resulting in a substantial loss of potential revenue for the state—estimated between $13 to $20 billion annually if reinstated. This revenue could address critical social needs in New York, including funding for educational institutions and housing
• There is historical importance of the tax in supporting essential services in New York
• Mentions Michael Kink, the Executive Director of Strong Economy for All Coalition believes there is long-term benefits of reinstituting the tax
• The website Greed versus Need tracks the positions of New York legislators regarding the stock transfer tax repeal. The campaign categorizes legislators as either supporting “greed” (opposing the bill) or “need” (supporting it). It is vital that we advocate for the passage of the bill. Currently, 17 senators and 44 assembly members support the initiative, but there is a need for increased pressure on key legislative leaders to overcome opposition from influential financial organizations
• Passing the stock transfer tax legislation is vital for the future well-being of all New Yorkers
• Outlines the breakdown of funds from a recently amended bill aimed at addressing critical social needs in New York State. Initially held up in April, the bill needed significant amendments, as it originally lacked allocations for crucial sectors like healthcare and education, focusing predominantly on transit. The speaker emphasized the importance of including funding for education and healthcare, given the pressing social issues, including homelessness, that the state faces
• The amended bill proposes a total of $13 billion, with 35% allocated to transportation, including public transit, highways, and Amtrak. This funding is described as “extra money,” not meant to replace existing budget allocations but to address urgent needs that current budgets overlook
• Specific allocations include $1.3 billion for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, $1.9 billion for education (with $325 million annually for SUNY and CUNY), and 25% for climate change and environmental initiatives. Additionally, 10% of the funds, amounting to $1.3 billion, would support affordable housing initiatives, particularly for the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) and state housing renewal efforts
• Warns against allowing these funds to be redirected to wealthy stockbrokers, highlighting opposition from influential financial organizations and individuals who benefit from tax rebates like the stock transfer tax rebate
• Funds should instead be used to meet the state’s critical infrastructure and social needs, urging support for the amended bill while referencing a website, greedvsneed.org, for further information on the issue and the opposing parties
• The compensation levels of co-chairs at a private equity company is extreme, noting that one earned over $675 million and the other over $637 million in just three years
• Argues against the opposition to a proposed minor tax on stock transactions, which he states would be only 1/10th to 1/4th of 1%—far less than New York City’s sales tax. The tax would primarily affect stock speculators engaged in rapid trading rather than public pension funds, which invest for the long term. The arguments against the tax are fearmongering, such as claims that the New York Stock Exchange would relocate or that retirees’ pensions would suffer
• Legislators must support the tax as a stance against greed
• Advocates for two main strategies: building a majority of legislative support and confronting financial institutions that oppose the tax. Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone is responsible for the company’s practices and their negative impact on tenants at Stuyvesant Town. Financial institutions are greedy entities that harm communities both locally and globally. Calls for action against rampant greed in the private equity sector are required

DISCUSSION

• John Mudd, MSCC: acknowledges Ray Rogers’ long-standing efforts in advocating for the stock transfer tax and references Bernie Sanders’ previous support for the idea. He asks Ray what strategies are being employed differently now to garner support for the initiative
• Ray Rogers: outlines a two-phase campaign aimed at securing legislative support for the stock transfer tax rebate. He emphasizes the need to pressure legislators to align with the campaign, highlighting that those who do not support it risk being labeled as greedy, particularly calling out Liz Kruger for her lack of response. He mentions that three local legislators are on board with the initiative, while Kruger remains unresponsive. Rogers expresses the importance of mobilizing constituents to communicate with Kruger and challenge her position. He also clarifies that he was not involved in the budget allocations made several years prior but stresses the need for funding in critical areas such as education, health care, and housing, particularly for NYCHA. He encourages collective action to influence the New York State Homes and Community Renewal regarding housing funding
• Damyanti Radheshwan: raised a question regarding the disparity in taxation between property transfers, particularly in New York City where a “millionaire’s tax” applies to high-value apartment sales, and stock transactions, particularly those involving co-operative apartments. She expressed confusion as to why these financial activities are not taxed similarly, prompting her to question the rationale behind the current tax structure
• Ray Rogers: responded by agreeing with Radheshwar’s concerns, emphasizing that many are questioning why large financial institutions and stockbrokers are not subjected to similar taxes. He highlighted the pressing social needs that could be addressed with the funds generated from such taxation, arguing that the lack of taxation on stock trades is unjustifiable and criticized the opposition to tax reforms as being based on unfounded reasoning and called for a more equitable approach to taxation
• Alex Yong, Westside Neighborhood Alliance: provided context regarding legislative dynamics. He noted that Senator Liz Krueger, chair of the Senate Finance Committee, may be constrained in championing any bills with significant fiscal implications due to directives from Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins. Yong explained that Krueger’s role involves responding to the Governor’s budget proposal, which limits her ability to advocate for substantial changes in taxation or fiscal policy at that time
• Ray Rogers: agreed that budget constraints often fail to meet societal needs and reiterated the importance of advocating for new revenue sources to address these needs. He expressed concern about potential political challenges from both the legislature and the governor but emphasized the necessity of rallying support across party lines for the proposed tax reforms
• John Mudd, MSCC: emphasizes the need to involve additional groups in discussions to support their initiative and suggests contacting legislators regarding the bill. He is open to organizing side meetings for more focused planning
• Ray Rogers: points out that there are three legislators in the district, two of whom are supportive. He suggests sending a letter to one of them, Liz Krueger, to engage her in communication. He also offers to connect the group with the legislative director for Senator James Sanders, who is willing to participate in discussions. Ray shares that he has an action plan stemming from previous community efforts and highlights the necessity of fundraising to support the campaign, as his organization has been operating on a volunteer basis
• John Mudd, MSCC: inquires about the budget allocation in the bill, questioning if there is flexibility for changes, particularly regarding funding for groups like those advocating for tenant rights. He suggests that if a significant constituency supports initiatives, such as right to counsel, there might be opportunities to fund their efforts
• Ray Rogers: responds affirmatively, noting that collaboration with someone from the Senator’s office, Paul Alexander, could facilitate this. He mentions the importance of NYCHA, emphasizing that it serves a large population with numerous tenant councils. Ray stresses the need to connect with Danny Barber, the head of the tenant councils, to mobilize this significant political bloc. He also discusses the strategy of starting with a conservative funding request to ensure the bill passes, arguing that once it is enacted, there will be opportunities to increase funding and generate more resources without burdening low-income individuals, ultimately benefiting critical needs in the community

NYCHA’S BOARD MEETING

Celines Miranda, a resident of the NYCHA buildings in Chelsea

• There is an ongoing fight against demolishing NYCHA properties in her area and during a recent board meeting, verbal approval for demolition plans was given. It is not finalized, and they remain hopeful and committed to opposing the demolition. Additional information: NYCHA ‘s board convened Wednesday, October 30, 2024 to approve a proposal to demolish buildings their properties—where around 4,500 people live—a plan that will unnecessarily uproot people’s lives, displace residents, take green spaces, end the section 9, continue the 30% cost burdening rents, add additional fees, and more. See the agenda summary here and See the board meeting here

Renee Keitt: 

• Clarified that the final decision for the demolition process lies with the Special Application Center, not NYCHA. She noted that, despite claims of an impending demolition, necessary paperwork and financing are still pending
• Highlighted that various steps must be taken, including approvals from the Community Board, borough president, and city council, before any demolition can occur. She shared that residents have gathered 949 signatures opposing the demolition, underscoring that the majority of tenants do not support the decision
• Criticized the negotiations happening without adequate resident involvement and pointed out discrepancies in funding estimates needed for NYCHA, asserting that the actual figure is lower than reported. She emphasized the importance of residents taking the initiative to uncover the truth about NYCHA’s situation and funding needs

DISCUSSION

• John Mudd, MSCC: expresses concern about the collaboration between lawyers and NYCHA, highlighting a condescending attitude and a lack of public engagement in discussions about development proposals. The presentation felt biased towards a specific developer, suggesting a troubling partnership in which NYCHA is allowing conditions to worsen by leaving apartments vacant. This could be a deliberate strategy
• Renee Keitt: acknowledges the issue of over 1,500 vacant apartments in NYCHA but emphasizes that the problems extend beyond just NYCHA to all housing sectors. The issues faced by NYCHA could affect other housing types, such as rent-controlled and stabilized units, highlighting a broader systemic problem. It’s important not to think that the focus on NYCHA is isolated, as similar issues could arise in their own communities
• Robert Robinson (Partners 4 Dignity & Rights/New School: agrees with the sentiments expressed by Renee and shares his experiences with political leaders’ reluctance to change the defense budget, indicating a broader systemic issue in governance. He raises a question about how to unite opinions among tenants, noting past support for demolition from some tenant leaders, which is divisive. He seeks advice on how someone like him, who doesn’t live in public housing but has influence in housing struggles, can effectively contribute to the movement and convey their messages to local and state officials
• Renee Keitt: emphasizes the importance of including the voices of all public housing residents, not just their leadership, in discussions about public housing issues. She points out that there are diverse opinions among residents and that decision-makers need to listen to the collective voice of the community. She also highlights the distinction between NYCHA as a public benefit corporation rather than a city agency, stressing that residents should be actively involved in conversations that affect their lives. Additionally, she calls for a shift in the stigma surrounding public housing, advocating for recognition of the contributions public housing residents make to society
• Celines M: agrees with Renee, reiterating that residents should be the ones speaking for themselves to strengthen their arguments. She believes that having elected officials hear directly from various groups affected by public housing issues will be beneficial
• John Mudd, MSCC’s: acknowledges that he does not live in public housing and thus will not speak for its residents. However, he expresses his desire to use his influence to alert government officials about public housing issues and to create opportunities for collaboration with residents
• Robert Robinson: supports Renee’s points about the stigma associated with public housing, sharing that he has long recognized its value as a social safety net. He cites notable individuals who grew up in public housing to illustrate its importance. Rob will reach out to both Renee and Celine for further discussions and connections
• John Mudd, MSCC: emphasizes the need for more public housing to address the lack of affordable options in the market. He appreciates the contributions made by Renee and others at the rally, highlighting the importance of including Spanish-speaking individuals in discussions, as they currently face disadvantages due to language barriers. He advocates for the use of interpreters to broaden participation and enhance community engagement
• Renee Keitt: community boards should also consider having interpreters to ensure inclusivity and effective communication
• Rashida Tyler: shares her experience at a policy forum where the Vice President of NYCHA discussed apartment renovations without addressing tenant impacts or allowing for audience questions. The narrative presents these renovations as fiscally responsible while neglecting the rights and needs of tenants is very concerning. Housing is a human right, and there is a need to question how tenants can counter the public narrative that favors government divestment from public housing
• Celines M: residents have been actively attending community board meetings to voice their concerns and have received support from coalitions and neighbors. She notes the mixed quality of journalism on the issue and feels that the ongoing meetings have been beneficial
• Renee Keitt: emphasizes the importance of campaigning and using social media to amplify the voices of tenants and affected communities. She criticizes the media for often relying on NYCHA press releases without consulting tenants for their perspectives. Renee advocates for proactive engagement with the press, including writing op-eds and commenting on articles highlighting issues such as public land use and demolition policies. There is a need for public hearings and discussions about these issues to ensure community voices are heard and to challenge the narrative set by authorities like NYCHA
• Rashida Tyler: strongly agrees with Renee’s points and suggests building relationships with media personnel to not just respond to existing stories but to create and control narratives. By proactively producing stories, they can put NYCHA on the defensive and shape public perception
• Celines M: mentions that Renee has written an op-ed, but they are struggling to get it published. She calls for assistance in finding media outlets that can give it the attention it needs
• John Mudd: inquires whether the op-ed has been distributed to a list of press contacts, highlighting the importance of targeted media outreach. He also supports using precise language in their advocacy efforts, such as promoting the right to counsel, to effectively challenge the narratives presented by NYCHA
• Rashida Tyler: discusses her background in organizing and media outreach, emphasizing her familiarity with media outlets beyond New York City, like Gothamist and New York Focus. Rashida offers to help promote events and messages related to housing issues, leveraging the organization’s reach of 7,500 congregations statewide because of her role as the Housing Chair for the New York City Council of Churches 
• Damyanti Radheshwar: reflects on her past work related to NYCHA housing and acknowledges the challenges she faced in organizing community efforts. She highlights the importance of engaging community members to gather their input effectively, suggesting collaboration and time are essential for a successful organization. She also discussed the importance of self-management in NYCHA housing and indicated a desire to discuss homelessness in future conversations
• Ray Rogers: there is a need for personalized campaign strategies, specifically mentioning Jamie Rubin, the CEO of the NYCHA board, and his role in the New York City 2025 initiative at NYU. He advocates for focusing on influential figures like Rubin. He suggests that he can provide advice and strategies for targeting these individuals in their campaigns, implying that personalizing outreach could enhance their effectiveness
• Renee Keitt: mentions that with Stephen Ross leaving for Florida, the remaining key players in a certain context are Jeff Blau, Jay Brodsky, and Bruce Beale
• Ray Rogers: highlights the challenges faced in the fight for decent housing, particularly emphasizing the negative influence of the Real Estate Board of New York. He shares his previous activism, including the website stoprebnybullies.org, which featured a video to raise awareness about real estate issues. He expresses concern about a coalition of wealthy individuals looking to take over NYCHA housing, particularly in East Harlem, where he resides. He notes the poor management of housing complexes and the threat posed by real estate interests
• Natasha Florentino: is a documentary filmmaker and is working on a film about the privatization of public housing across the U.S. She is currently focusing on a short documentary about a proposed demolition plan in Chelsea. Her goal is to create an educational tool for residents and the community to understand the realities of living through a demolition plan, countering the appealing images of new apartments that often entice public support. She plans to incorporate a resident-centered perspective, including interviews and visuals to convey the true experience of such demolitions effectively
• Natasha Florentino: emphasizes the importance of focusing on the proposed demolition, which she believes is a model the housing authority intends to replicate. She urges everyone to understand the implications of this demolition, suggesting it could be harmful to other residents in NYCHA if they do not support the Chelsea residents in preventing it
• John Mudd, MSCC: shifts the discussion towards homelessness issues, recalling a prior conversation with Rob Robinson about the criminalization of homelessness and how it could be a focus for an upcoming national meeting. He mentions a bill related to this issue
• Robert Robinson, Partners 4 Dignity & Rights/New School: clarifies that the signed law refers to a Supreme Court decision allowing for the criminalization of homelessness. He mentions a formal complaint filed with the UN regarding this issue, noting that it is becoming a global problem as municipalities criminalize homeless individuals. Rob highlights an upcoming policy forum at the CUNY Graduate Center on November 20th, encouraging others to attend and create tension in discussions about this important issue  9 AM to 1:30 PM https://cfh.swoogo.com/Policy for registration 
• Robert Robinson, (Partners 4 Dignity & Rights/New School):  York City is mishandling homelessness and points to the significant increase in the number of people in shelters since 2008, indicating a failure in the system. He criticizes the lack of change in strategies over decades, suggesting that the city is repeating mistakes from the past without recognizing them
• Damyanti Radheshwar: There is a societal perception of homelessness that emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding beyond aesthetics. She advocates for the provision of housing, referencing her experience with supportive housing in Brooklyn and highlighting a native American group’s culturally connected housing initiative in Seattle. She stresses the importance of respect in addressing homelessness and offers to share more information on the Seattle project
• Alex Yong, (Westside Neighborhood Alliance): promotes the upcoming Westside Tenants Conference, emphasizing its relevance to housing issues in New York City. He invites attendees to participate in the event scheduled for December 7th at Fordham Law School, mentioning past speakers and the involvement of mayoral candidates who will be questioned about their plans for the city. He encourages people to vote on topics they want to hear from the candidates. Postscript https://www.hcc-nyc.org/post/19th-annual-west-side-tenant-conference-huge-success
• Luana Green: Alex Yong will speak at the Penn South Conversations in Color event on Thursday, November 7, at 6 PM. He will be sharing his insights on various housing issues. Luana is hosting the event.  lgreen@psb.coop for RSVPs 

CHAT BOX 

• Robert Robinson, Partners 4 Dignity & Rights/New School:

Shared a link to a discussion on national vs. local homelessness policy and its implications: [National vs. Local Homelessness Policy] (https://cfh.swoogo.com/Policy). 

• Rashida Tyler: Expressed interest in seeing a specific plan regarding the discussion topic
• Alex Yong, Westside Neighborhood Alliance: Clarified that he only has bullet points available for Rashida. Shared a link to the Greed vs. Need website: [Greed vs Need] (https://greedvsneed.org/). Offered to screen share a flyer related to Greed vs. Need and commented on the responses from senators regarding the organization. Discussed the significance of the January 2023 win in Stuy Town vs. Blackstone, where the Stuy Town residents retain rent stabilization protections for more than 5,000 units. and provided insights on the role of the Senate Finance Committee Chair
• Andrew Bonfrancesco, Housing Works: Inquired if a representative from the mayor’s office would attend the meetings, highlighting the recent changes within that office. Commented on the potential influence of the mayor’s office on legislative matters and referenced a merger of core entities in 2019
• Renee Keitt: Shared a link concerning Blackstone’s end of the rent stabilization fight at Stuy-Town: [Blackstone Ends Rent Stabilization Fight] (https://therealdeal.com/new-york/2024/02/26/blackstone-ends-rent-stabilization-fight-at-stuy-town/). Noted that Blackstone is involved in Hudson Yards
• Alex Yong, Westside Neighborhood Alliance: emphasized the rapid responses from Senator Liz Krueger’s staff, mentioning his good rapport with Sarra and Dana. He noted that Andrea Stewart-Cousins had advised Krueger not to support any bills with significant fiscal impacts due to her role as Chair of the Senate Finance Committee. Alex pointed out that this might explain Krueger’s lack of public support for certain legislation. He also shared insights on the statewide RTC bill’s financial implications, highlighting Krueger’s conditional willingness to co-sponsor if the Senate supported it during their February budget negotiations. Alex encouraged others to articulate the role of the Senate Finance Committee Chair and provided a link to a form for the upcoming WSNA convention, where questions for the 2025 Mayoral candidates can be submitted. [Link to form](https://bit.ly/wsnamayorforum)
• Renee Keitt: mentioned that Blackstone is located in Hudson Yards and shared an email for suggestions regarding their FEC campaign: stopfecdemolition@gmail.com
• Andrew Bonfrancesco, Housing Works: discussed the diminishing support from realty companies for disenfranchised communities now that the state of COVID has ended. He expressed concern over the inhumane treatment of vulnerable populations in New York City and urged for a focus on supportive housing facilities
• Robert Robinson, Partners 4 Dignity & Rights/New School: advocated for organizing strategies and emphasized the importance of collaboration with groups like Community Voices Heard, GOLES, CAAAV, and CASA, which have long supported public housing residents. He highlighted the need for a robust communication strategy in their organizing efforts
• Luana Green: acknowledged Andrea Stewart-Cousins’ background in public housing and supported Robert’s call for organization. She expressed a sentiment of classist racism affecting marginalized populations
• Jessica Guity Thompson, Progressive Management of NY: shared that Progressive Management has successfully converted two major developments through the PACT program, now managing around 2,000 units in partnership with NYCHA and a private developer. She noted the positive changes resulting from ongoing renovations and quality management
• Celines M: criticized the Gothamist for misleading coverage about their FEC cause but praised the Architect Newspaper for accurately representing their issues
• Rashida Tyler: agreed with Luana’s sentiments about the marketing challenges they face and emphasized the need for effective communication
• Andrew Bonfrancesco, Housing Works: reiterated the urgency of addressing the treatment of vulnerable communities in the city, stressing that overall community well-being cannot thrive amid displacement and suffering
• Alex Yong, Westside Neighborhood Alliance: provided a critical view of the real estate industry, particularly the EIC, while acknowledging the presence of some good journalists within it. Three candidates have confirmed their attendance at an upcoming event, and they are awaiting confirmation from more candidates. He clarified that he is not the organizer of the event but is providing updates based on what he knows
• Renee Keitt: shared a link to a YouTube video featuring Jamie Rubin and Lisa Bova Hiatt discussing the citizen budget commission. The video highlights the Fulton Elliott Chelsea model. [Citizen Budget Commission Talk] (https://youtu.be/K-qKqLkEyz8?si=ZsnezWVtztPRS2QG) 
• Robert Robinson, Partners 4 Dignity & Rights/New School: provided information on a national versus local homelessness policy discussion titled “Who Sets the Priorities, Who Provides the Services? https://cfh.swoogo.com/Policy
• Luana Green: shared an email address for registration and participation in the policy discussion, indicating a supportive role in facilitating connections. lgreen@psb.coop

NEXT Meeting Homeless and Housing Meeting: 9:30 AM Tuesday, December 3, 2024. Always the 1^st Tuesday of every month. Contact hello@midtownsouthcc.org or john.mudd@usa.net for more information and Zoom invitations.