MSCC, Posted: March 26, Event Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025, @ 9:30 am-11:00 am, ZOOM.US
SUMMARY
Sam Turvey, RehinkNYC, Through-running Transit advocate, will speak about the changes in Hochul’s General Project Plan (GPP) for the Penn Station Area; Ray Rogers, Activist for Corporate Campaign to end the Stock Transfer Tax Rebate will speak about his ongoing campaign efforts; Tatiana Hill, Office Of The Community Liaison, will speak about protecting the public in these times; Katy Lasell, Policy Associate, New Economy Project and Jared Young, Tenant Rights Advocate, Housing Conservation Coordinators (HCC), West Side Neighborhood Association (WSNA), will speak about Tenant Opportunity To Purchase Act (TOPA); Jordyn Rosenthal, Mental Health Activist, Community Access will discuss her efforts for bill passage.
CHAIR: John Mudd
WELCOME / INTRODUCTIONS
We appreciate all suggestions to help us run this meeting proficiently.
PURPOSE
The Homeless and Housing members, attendees, and speakers share knowledge, ideas, and resources to identify problems and find solutions to the homeless, housing, and health crisis.
5 min
POLICY MEETING UPDATES
The prior 8:30 Homeless and Housing Policy meeting wrap-up as presented by attending members.
0 min
COUNCIL HIGHLIGHTS
Council’s progress report on actions and initiatives.
3 min
SPECIAL INTRODUCTION(S) AND OR UPDATES:
The below list of intros and updates should be brief; everyone is welcomed to present for a lengthier discussion at a planned date
2 min
CHANGES IN HOCHUL’S GENERAL PROJECT PLAN (GPP)
Basic information on the process, and overview on expectations
Speaker: Sam Turvey, Advocate for Through-running transit system
20 min
TOPA, TENANT OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE ACT
This act would change people’s lives by putting their housing in their hands
Speakers: Katy Lasell, Policy Associate, New Economy Project; Jared Young, Tenant Advocate, Housing Conservation Coordinators (HCC), West Side Neighborhood Association (WSNA)
20 min
CAMPAIGN TO END THE STOCK TRANSFER TAX REBATE
There has been a flow of capital back into the hands of the stock traders that belongs to the public. Ray Rogers is on a mission to have those funds put to better use. NYCHA maintenance is on the list.
Speaker: Ray Rogers, Activist and Labor Organizer
5 min
THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY LIAISON
The office documents the concerns from community members who have been impacted by Sop-and-frisk policy
Speakers: Tatiana Hill, Office Of The Community Liaison
5 min
COMMUNITY ACCESS
A housing and mental health advocacy group.
Speaker: Jordyn Rosenthal, Director of Advocacy
10 min
PUBLIC CONCERNS
5 min
ACTIONS
2 min
ANNOUNCEMENTS / EVENTS
2 min
DEVELOPING INITIATIVES & PROGRAMS
2min
AOB
2 min
Contact hello@midtownsouthcc.org or john.mudd@usa.net for more information and Zoom invitations.
ADDENDUM A: ANDRE P: COMMENTS POST FEBRUARY 4, 2025 HOMELESS AND HOUSING MEETING
Gentlemen,
As a follow-up to today’s MSCC meeting, I’d like to add some comments; I posted some in the chat channel, but they seem to have gone unnoticed.
Thinking yesterday about today’s meeting, I had a eureka moment. The phrase “criminalization of homelessness” is always used in the context of homeless people being criminally charged, or harassed with “move along” orders, when they’re in streets, subways, or other public spaces. But we should also look into criminalization of homeless people *inside* shelters, safe havens, drop-in centers, supportive housing, and other institutions that are supposed to help them and care for them. It happens more often than we know.
Shelter workers harass a client in various ways, then claim the client is harassing *them* and call the police. Or clients (perhaps acting in concert with workers) harass, assault, even murder other clients (Deven Black), and workers refuse to defend the victims, then paint the victims as perpetrators.
A similar issue is “psychiatrization” – intentionally false-positive psychiatric misdiagnoses or mischaracterizations, both of individual clients (often in their secret files) and of homeless people in general, eg. those found in the streets with clothing inadequate for the season (attributing the client’s “inability to meet his basic needs” to his alleged mental-health problems rather than failures of the homelessness and welfare agencies to live up to their duties of care – and then attempting to lock him up in a psychiatric facility under an expanded “basic needs” standard Mayor Adams and Gov. Hochul are pushing for).
Most homeless outreach efforts, no matter how much good faith, effort, and taxpayers’ money or volunteers’ time goes into them, will be wasted if the DHS system continues to be as dysfunctional, dangerous, and abusive as it is. I believe the first thing to do would be to have it develop a fair and effective system for handling complaints. Currently, it’s geared to ignore, delay, then retaliate against the clients, rather than do justice and improve the conditions. That’s why people are put out or leave, and then are very reluctant to go back in. (And sometimes accused of “refusing help”.)
An important related issue is access to evidence. Workers write notes about clients, put them in the CARES computer record system, but never let clients read them, rarely tell them of their existence, and don’t respond to formal requests under the Personal Privacy Protection Law. Worse, the DHS forbade taking photos, videos, and live streaming (DHS-PB-2022-015), then also audio recording (DHS-PB-2024-005) – no exceptions, even for crimes in progress. Without evidence, we can’t prove the truth. And without the truth, we can’t have justice, except by accident.
In my opinion, concerned advocates should take a greater interest in what happens inside the shelter system and try to improve it, and help clients who have standing to improve it. When the shelters are fit for human habitation and the unsheltered know it, it won’t take much for them to get in.
Would you share your thoughts on this?
ADDENDUM B: Damu Radheshwar’s Urban Planning Proposal
D R a d h e s h w a r Damyanti Radheshwar FIIA AIA LEED AP
Damu@DRadheshwar.com
www.dradheshwar.com
Architect + Urban Planner and Strategist
Updated February 23, 2025; Original: November 22, 2019
Living your life in Your Own Home in Public Housing
NYCHA Housing – a Pilot Program for Self-Management: An Abstract
Stakeholders: NYCHA Resident Tenants, Tenants Unions and Community Advocates
Ownership Structure: NYCHA, HPD, and NYC and NYS Agencies
Planning – Analysis and Recommendations
In my submission for the Loeb Fellowship a few years ago, I proposed a pilot plan for ‘self-management’ that
empowers residents to assume responsibilities through training, advocacy, and using available economic resources.
NYCHA Physical Need Assessment
Capital Need Categories
Housing Deficiencies
Capital Needs
Capital Funding Sources
Capital Commitment
Intention:
• NYCHA residents select a building to run the pilot program.
• Create a pilot program for residents’ self-management by offering them training in property management
and allocating funds typically budgeted by NYCHA for that specific property. Provide financing for physical
needs assessments, address deficiencies, implement necessary capital improvements, manage HAZMAT
mitigation, ensure code compliance for life safety and the environment, and carry out essential significant
repairs.
• Through participatory planning and budgeting, the stakeholder community will establish and prioritize the
specifications for a baseline level of well-built and well-maintained interior and exterior spaces to improve
conditions. The minimum standard for residential occupancy specified by the New York State Multiple
Dwelling Code will be met and exceeded.
• Support equitable social and economic opportunities for the residents in a democratically operated
cooperative arrangement.
• The concept of “towers in the park,” based on Le Corbusier’s proposed master plan for Paris, has not
succeeded in New York and other cities across the USA. In Paris, people prefer walkable streets that foster
social and commercial activities like shopping, dining, and cafés, creating economic opportunities for the
community. At night, the deserted sidewalks around NYCHA projects often evoke a sense of insecurity. A
focus on activating the streets could be integrated into the pilot program. This can be achieved through
small shops, farmers markets, and arts and crafts initiatives run by the residents, revitalizing the streetscape
and generating creative economic prospects. The value created can then be used to enhance the pilot
program further.
• Measure the program’s impact every 2-5 years. If it is deemed successful, build capacity for the other
properties in the NYCHA system.D R a d h e s h w a r Architect + Urban Planner and Strategist
Resources
• NYC Community Land Trust wants to “Go Big” partner with NYC Community Initiative (NYCCLI)
• NYC and NYS Economic Development Corporations
• Neighborhood Planning Playbook
• Research examples in other cities, e.g., Dudley Street in Boston
• The RAD Rental Assistance Demonstration for NYCHA?
Funding Resources:
• Leverage funding: NYCHA budget allocated for maintenance, federal resources, Low-Income Housing Tax
Credit (LIHTC), Private Activity Bonds, etc.
• Private sponsorship to partially or fully support the pilot program
• Other resources to be explored
Tools:
• Alternate Options ownership/rental
• Down payment assistance/ Incentives
• Upgrade aging boiler systems
• The Housing Plan: At Work In Your Neighborhood
• In May 2014, Mayor Bill de Blasio unveiled Housing New York: A Five-Borough, Ten-Year Plan to
create and preserve 200,000 high-quality, affordable homes over ten years.
• In January 2020, the Administration launched YOUR Home NYC, the next phase of Housing New York.
Through YOUR Home NYC, we are strengthening our efforts to build and preserve affordable housing, create
neighborhood wealth, and protect renters.
• Mitchell-Lama Reinvestment Program – help aging Mitchell-Lamas stay affordable
• HomeFix Housing provides financial assistance to low-income homeowners to make repairs and keep their
homes healthy and safe.
• Advance the growth of Community Land Trusts (CLTs) by working with Enterprise Community Partners to
secure funding for emerging and existing land trusts dedicated to preserving and creating affordable
housing in neighborhoods they know best.
• Tenant Union
• Capacity building
• Leverage funding: federal resource
• RADS
• Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)
• Private Activity Bonds
• EDC and HPD
• Conditions Assessment, Participatory planning, and budgeting
• Explore Economic and Entrepreneurial opportunities in creative ways
ADDENDUM C: RAY ROGERS: STOCK TRANSFER TAX REBATE